Proposed 30-Year PILOT for Edger Apartment Project

Big Flats Town Supervisor Lee G. expressed support for the apartment project but strongly objected to the 30-year duration of the PILOT and the disproportionate tax split favoring the school district.

Big Flats town board member Amanda Lippecot echoed concerns about the tax burden on residents and the tone-deaf nature of the long tax break.

A local resident living across the street from the project voiced dismay over the lack of notice and public meeting transparency, arguing that fixed-income residents will bear an unfair tax burden.

Big Flats Councilman John Hunter argued that IDA funds should be spent on manufacturing and job creation rather than residential projects that do not bring net-new jobs.

A long-time resident warned that a 30-year tax break could be detrimental if major regional employers pull out in the future, leaving the town struggling.

A resident questioned when questions from the previous public hearing would be answered and expressed concern over rising home assessments.

A Big Flats resident and fire commissioner criticized the timing of public meetings and the 30-year duration of the tax break.

A resident pointed out that a lack of transparency and communication erodes public trust between residents and developers.

Big Flats Town Assessor Mel Stort clarified that residential assessments are not directly tied to the project, but criticized the IDA for lack of communication with town officials.

Developer David Riedman explained that the 30-year PILOT request is driven by current construction costs and interest rates, and noted his proposal for a $150,000 town impact fee.